Right Wing radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh likes to refer to himself a “talent on loan from God”. He will be today’s exhibit of how beliefs have consequences, and how religious beliefs can cause harm .
On the subject of human-caused global warming, Rush (who has millions of listeners) has said:
"If you believe in God, then intellectually you cannot believe in man-made global warming. You must be agnostic or atheistic to believe that man controls something he can't create. It’s always been one of the reasons for my anti man-made global warming stance."
The purpose of this blog post is not to generate arguments over global warming. I merely offer the Limbaugh quote as an example of how a religious belief can drive irresponsible and dangerous attitudes which could have far-reaching implications for the planet.
With this faith-based claim, he sweeps aside any present or future scientific findings. His presuppositional beliefs in God and creationism dictate that he reject any scientific evidence to the contrary. He thinks that his god created the planet and therefore, nothing we can do as human beings could significantly damage it.
In his book The Way Things Ought To Be, he says:
"My views on the environment are rooted in my belief in Creation. I don't believe that life on earth began spontaneously or as a result of some haphazard, random selection process.”
But hey, it's just a belief, what's the harm - right?
If Rush’s ‘talent’ is on loan from God, then his god must be quite poor in the reasoning skills department. Does Rush not think that nuclear bombs could have an impact on our planet? That we can endlessly pollute and not endanger the conditions of the world in which our descendants will live?
Rush’s god is imaginary, but the influence this god wields over his mind, and the minds of his many followers poses a very real danger.
There's definitely a lot useless shite stored between my ears. That's for sure. I love that wee site. Christers who can have a bit of a laugh at the scriptures, while trying to explain...
Haha! Sarcasm aside. Nope, not just a catchphrase...from my link in the comment below on Malachi, referring also to the other various references to shit, peresh in Hebrew in the OT:- Two things...
Cahn assumes an objective moral structure to make his argument work, but if one rejects that premise, his thought experiment loses much of its force. From a subjective morality standpoint, Cahn’s...
That is exactly the plotline at the moment in a popular UK soap opera. A student doctor whose mother was killed in an accident, which was just the most recent heartache in a long list he was now...
YahwehJesus is not averse to rubbing shite in the faces of those priests that displeased him. Malachi 2:1-9 — And now, O priests, this command is for you. If you will not listen,...
The bloody, gory history of Europe is to no small extent the story of Christian on Christian violence waged in the name of Christianity. Christianity did not add a single moral concept to the world.
As I've said before, if archaeologists could document every place Jesus sat, spat and shat, it wouldn't prove any theological claim made in the New Testament.
Given the nature of the evidence (or lack thereof), we could dos-à-dos, vis-à-vis, and otherwise dance around the topic forever without arriving at any unassailable conclusion which, I suppose, is...
My questions of the day: if Jesus was human, did he defecate every day of his life like all humans do?Absent of toilet paper, how did he clean himself? Did he wash his hands after every go? Why is...