Do I Sound Like a Fundamentalist?

Since I appear so cocksure that Christianity is a delusion some people think I'm a fundamentalist on a par with the late Jerry Falwell. Here's a discussion I'm having about this with a Christian philosopher:

Him:

Lordy, John! You sound like a fundamentalist! How come that kind of talk is irrational when it comes out of the mouth of Jerry Falwell?

John:

Maybe because there are so many ways to be wrong? It's much more rational to say someone is wrong (since so many others would agree with this assessment) than it is to say everyone is wrong (since that takes a helluva lot of chutzpah).

Him:

The logic of rationality is interesting, isn't it? I can be rational in believing that P and rational in believing that Q, but not rational in believing that P & Q!!

John:

Well, yes, what it means for someone to be rational is a very interesting question. I can't say I have a handle on it. But what I do know is that human beings are not all that rational. Psychological studies have proven this. We make many decisions for emotive reasons not logical ones.

Among a myriad number of answers to why we exist it would seem that people who affirm the one and only exclusively correct view of it all are swayed to think this way because of emotive reasons.

And for every such answer the rest of us are skeptics of that answer. So all of us are skeptics, all of us. I join with many many others in rejecting the claims of any specific branch of Christianity (branches which deny the others are representative of true Christianity).

When I say Christians are deluded I'm not saying anything different than what most others say, even what other branches of Christianity say about the others. I am so sure I am right that they are wrong I'm willing to risk the Christian hell because of it. That's pretty sure.

But as the proverb says, "It's easier to smell a rotten egg than it is to lay a good one." I'm an egg smeller type of feller. ;-) Christianity is a rotten egg.

Now when you ask me what I think is the case, you'll see that at heart I'm an agnostic, one who, because he is an agnostic simply moves over a step to say there are no supernatural explanations or gods or goddesses. How sure am I about what I affirm? Oh, about 75% (it depends on the day). That seems more reasonable or rational to me. This universe and the life forms in it are way too mysterious for me to claim there isn't some sort of "ultimate concern" or something that may transcend existence. Maybe the best explanation is that "the whole is greater than the sum of it's parts" and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin is right after all? Although I don't think so for that too is affirming an answer to the riddle of existence.

If there is a supernatural entity then it makes no difference in how I should live my life, how I can discover morality, or in how I should investigate something. It is a completely unnecessary hypothesis. Such an entity can be safely ignored. So if nothing else I am a practical atheist (and even a protest atheist), but I think most people are practical atheists anyway.