"A Fault Is Not a Sin: It's idiotic to blame anything other than geology for the Haitian earthquake." by Christopher Hitchens

On Nov. 1, 1755—the feast of All Saint's Day—a terrifying combination of earthquake and tsunami shattered the Portuguese capital city of Lisbon. Numerous major churches were destroyed and many devout worshippers along with them. This cataclysmic event was a spur to two great enterprises: the European Enlightenment and the development of seismology. Voltaire and Jean-Jacques Rousseau were only some of those who reasoned that no thinkable deity could have desired or ordained the obliteration of Catholic Lisbon, while other thinkers—Immanuel Kant among them—began to inquire into the possible natural causes of such events.

Today, we can clearly identify the "fault" that runs under the Atlantic Ocean and still puts Portugal and other countries at risk, and it took only a few more generations before there was a workable theory of continental drift. We live on a cooling planet with a volcanic interior that is insecurely coated with a thin crust of grinding tectonic plates. Earthquakes and tsunamis are to be expected and can even to some degree be anticipated. It's idiotic to ask whose fault it is. The Earth's thin shell was quaking and cracking millions of years before human sinners evolved, and it will still be wrenched and convulsed long after we are gone. These geological dislocations have no human-behavioral cause. The believers should relax; no educated person is going to ask their numerous gods "why" such disasters occur. A fault is not the same as a sin.

However, the believers can resist anything except temptation. Where would they be if such important and frightening things had natural and rational explanations? They want the gods to be blamed. After the titanic eruption of Krakatoa in 1883, the Muslims of Indonesia launched a hugely successful campaign to recruit terrified local people to Islamic repentance. Following the more recent Asian tsunami of 2004, religious figures jostled to provide every possible "explanation" of tectonic events in terms of mere human conduct. (It was widely asserted in earlier times that earthquakes were caused by sodomy, yet San Francisco still stands, and when it suffered thousands of deaths in the catastrophic 1906 earthquake, it was rather more heterosexual than it is now. Hurricane Katrina inundated much of New Orleans but saw fit to spare the immoral French Quarter.)

As so often, the first priest out of the trap on this occasion was that evil moron Pat Robertson, who announced on the Christian Broadcasting Network that Haitians had long ago made an agreement with Satan to enlist diabolic help against French imperialism. The implication was clear ... for this offense, God would kill underfed Haitian babies in slums 200 years later. (He would also kill the Archbishop of Port-au-Prince, Joseph Serge Miot, and bring his cathedral down on his head, though since Pat Robertson doesn't really think that Catholics are proper Christians, there's perhaps scant irony there.)

Robertson is stupidly trying to channel an event that may have occurred on the night of Aug. 14, 1791, when a large voodoo ceremony is said to have been held by the rebellious slaves of Haiti. After an animal sacrifice (of a black pig) to the maternal spirit of Ezili Danto, all present at Bois Caiman swore to slay their white Christian masters. This is sometimes taken as the signal for the revolt that, under the charismatic leadership of Toussaint L'Ouverture, drove French troops and slaveholders from Haiti and established the world's first black republic. (The essential book here is The Black Jacobins, by Trinidadian author C.L.R. James.) Americans have good reason to be thankful for that outcome, because it was the vanquishing of Napoleon that enabled celebrated agnostic Thomas Jefferson to negotiate the Louisiana Purchase and double the size of the United States.

This would have been quite a useful pact with the devil, but voodoo or santería and their related religious fusions are not Satanistic. They are, rather, a localized and Africanized form of Catholic superstition, based on much the same calendar and communion of saints that was being celebrated in Lisbon on that day in 1755. And if any single thing explains the abject misery of Haiti in the years between independence and today, it is the prevalence of religious cultism in its various aspects. Voodoo keeps people afraid and makes them cowed into apathy by the nearness of the spirit world. It was exploited by the horrible Tonton Macoute regime of "Papa Doc" Duvalier and his gruesome son, who for decades kept the country as their own rack-rented fief. But please do not forget that Mother Teresa came to Port-au-Prince in 1981 to receive the Haitian Légion d'honneur from "Baby Doc," as well as to accept stolen money from him, and that the Vatican protected the foul system for as long as it was able. In September 1992, exiled President Jean-Bertrand Aristide denounced the Vatican from the podium of the United Nations, correctly pointing out that it maintained the only embassy that still recognized the continuing post-Duvalier dictatorship. Unfortunately, Aristide's own brand of religious populism was a failure. Still, one cannot believe that the Almighty has recently slaughtered so many Haitians because of the unbelievable squalidness of their competing priesthoods.

Currently, the cry is that Robertson is out of step and that it is Christian charities that are doing the hardest work. By all means let the pious agree to keep God out of it (though I wonder if that doesn't make them feel slightly insipid). However, the heaviest lifting will, in fact, be done by nonreligious outfits like UNICEF and the International Red Cross (which may sound Christian, but isn't). The biggest work of all will be performed by carrier groups and airborne brigades of the United States, the taxpayer-financed forces of a secular republic. The vital next stage—beyond mere charity and rescue—will be to try and liberate Haiti's people from fear of witch doctors of all stripes and to educate them in the family planning that their country so urgently needs. Let's see how the various parties of God come out on that.

In the meantime, I urge everybody to think first as a human being, and to give as much as they can to any relief organization at all, but most especially by contacting the newest secular aid group at Non-Believers Giving Aid.

Link
Hitchens seems to be getting better and better don't you think?

HT: Unreasonable Faith

13 comments:

Breckmin said...

Often the Christian says "ask what happened?" rather than "Why?" and you will get your answer to the causes for the "evils" in the world. (evils is in quotes to equal all the bad things, but even the word "bad" is imperfect with respect to God's Infinite Decree and "natural laws" which affect plates.

Clearly we can blame the "fault" and divert the question to one of timing...and interaction with human habitation choices at that specific time.

Will God will work in the trenches of these tragedies to bring new people to Christ?

Is salvation the logical greater good?

Anonymous said...

Often the Christian says "ask what happened?" rather than "Why?"

Often rational people ask both and get a better understanding of the situation.

What happened: a strike-slip fault did its normal thing after gathering pressure for hundreds of years.

Why: plate tectonics.

No need for divine intervention at all.

Breckmin said...

@ Kilre
So you shouldn't have any problem if Christianity begins to spread through Haiti and changes peoples lives and they begin to worship and praise Jesus...

You can just blame magnetic fields and pressures that "started" the whole thing.

Anonymous said...

Breckmin,

It's not in my business to tell people what they can believe. I make it my business to mock people for believing silly things. Besides, they're already thanking Jesus for saving them anyway; never mind the dead, though, that he didn't save.

As to what caused the earthquake, there were several geological studies done that indicated that something like this would happen soon (soon as in geologically soon). We knew that it was coming but not when exactly.

Why didn't the Christian god save more people by showing them a sign of the disaster to come? Hundreds of thousands could have been alive today. Is that the malevolent nature of the deity? Is it sitting back, in some untestable, unreachable realm apart from time and space, getting off on our suffering?

I can see why people would need to delude themselves to make this tragedy seem like a good thing in the long run, but I'm not going to be a party to the self deprecation.

District Supt. Harvey Burnett said...

I appreciate what Hitchens said. The church,since it was there when all the atheists aid groups didn't care, should have been more influential in setting this government straight and liberating the people for the beginning.

But then when a church liberates people, critics such as yourselves seem to think that out of place too, because the church is only for spiritual beliefs right???

Hogwash! The church SHOULD have educated and empowered the people to be and live free and empower their social environment...BUT...like within many minority communities, even in Haiti, very few care until it either effects them or it's so tragic until something if forced or made to happen...

The earthquake, certainly a natural terror, but thank God, that people like Hitchens, you and others are finally concerned enough to do something and promote a significant change...unfortunate that so many had to die to get that attention...

Chuck said...

Harvey

What secular intervention would stop plate tectonics from being plate tectonics? Did you read the editorial? Did you understand it?

Mark Plus said...

When comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 struck the planet Jupiter in 1994, did that show that god punished the inhabitants of Jupiter?

Breckmin said...

"Why didn't the Christian god save more people by showing them a sign of the disaster to come?"

Everyone dies in this temporary creation...it is only a matter of "how." You could ask this question for anything...including
"abortion." Why doesn't God give America/the world a "sign" so that we will no longer kill human life that looks like a baby? Whether it is
an earthquake in San Francisco or
in Somalia - each quake will affect
each person differently. The numbers all mathematically approach zero on a scale of infinity. Human beings look at numbers as though they mean something. They are evasive to growth and TO the individual themselves. Billions and billions of people die throughout history. It is a matter of 'how' and whether they received GRACE. There is nothing fair about grace.
If God saves hundreds of thousands
for all of eternity through spiritaul salvation..then they will be "alive" forever.

"Hundreds of thousands could have been alive today." "

No sign will be given except for the sign of Jonah given through Christ. (except that there is coming a person who will deceive the world through signs).

Is that the malevolent nature of the deity?"

We are all born into the potential of being enemies of God who will be punished for every violation and trangression we have ever done against this Holy Creator. The Creator Who "owns" all of the matter in this universe is the only one Who has the logical right to "harm" you. To say that this is somehow "evil" is problematic for you philosophically.

By what standard would you appeal to - to judge that God (the Creator and Owner of the universe) is somehow "evil?"

This is no accident that you can not raise this charge. God is Lord of both philosophy and theology.

Appealing to "fairness" is a concept that is not observable in the universe... I assert the Law
of Unfairness and open it up for falsification for ONE example of perfect "fairness" in this universe.

If fairness is not observable..then it is NOT a valid appeal to apply to anything.

"Is it sitting back, in some untestable, unreachable realm apart from time and space, getting off on our suffering?"

I believe it is illogical for anything to be apart from infinite time and infinite 3 dimensional spatial existence (notice I did not say space or quantum space).

You can test "information" "biogenesis" and other things such as IF-THEN algorithmic programming via scientifice observation to lead you to the conclusion that there IS "a" Creator. The belief that
this Creator is the God of Abraham is a different argument.

No. God is a Holy Creator Who does not do anything close to what humans do in a progressive linear time line experience of duration.
(clearly "anything close" is imperfect here since we are created in God's Conscious Image).

The logical causes of the earthquake are part of God's plan for this temporary creation which is redeeming people out of being enemies of God because of the potential byproduct of choice.
We would have to be omniscient to know whether God is bringing salvation through the spreading of the gospel to people in Haiti...
but one thing we DO know.

Everything that has a cause is logical to exist.

Breckmin said...

"they're already thanking Jesus for saving them anyway; never mind the dead, though, that he didn't save"

This is an appeal to "fairness" - something that does not exist in this universe and it is therefore illogical to appeal to.

There is nothing "fair" about Grace.

Anonymous said...

No Breckmin,

it's called irony.

Piero said...

Breckmin:

"The Creator Who "owns" all of the matter in this universe is the only one Who has the logical right to "harm" you. To say that this is somehow "evil" is problematic for you philosophically."

It is not problematic at all. In fact, it is just one more piece of evidence in favour of the hypothesis that God does not exist.

Exploring the Unknowable said...

Maybe I take it too personally, but when I read Christians on this site continually rationalize these abolutely terrible events as the actions of a good and loving God, I literally get nauseous. There is NO WAY this is the action of a good and loving God. That's absolutely as stupid as seeing two people finally marrying their childhood sweethearts, a completely joyous moment, and then concluding, there certainly is a completely hateful and malevolent God. Both conclusions are just moronic.

I'm sick of wearing kid gloves when dealing wtih this. Given the amount of gratuitous suffering in this world and completely random, indifferent natural disasters, there is every reason in the world to believe that there is no loving God and no reason to believe that there is. To believe that God loves Haiti in any matter is to utterly destroy what the word love means. If God could love me and still kill me in such a tremendously painful and pitiless way, than I would rather God not love me at all.

It is one thing for the atheist to say that this earthquake happened and it was unavoidable. It might seem unloving, but at least we are facing reality. The theist, on the other hand, looks us in the eye and tells us that this earthquake didn't have to happen; it could have been prevented by their God, but he didn't, rather watched as close to half a million lives are snuffed out, millions more left homeless and in ruin, and generations beyond which will be affected negatively.

And we should bow down and praise this God!!!

I can't imagine a more twisted and depraved worldview.

As a related aside; when my father passed away 4 years ago after a 2 year long battle with cancer that left him dying without a voice, the inability to function on his own, a heartrate upwards of 200 BPM, and a look of fear and despondence in his eyes of facing his own demise (he was a Roman Catholic, but not even that could console him), I was in the height of my fundamentalist days.

During his entire sickenss, I was going through one of my darkest phases of Christianity, trying to assure myself of my own salvation, trying to assure myself that God would save my dad from Hell, and trying to reconcile God's goodness in the light of my father's condition.

I should have been grieving over my father's death. I should have been spending all my energy helping my family cope with this tragedy. My mind and my heart should have been completely given over to honoring his memory, cherishing the time I spent with him, and remembering all the great things he did for this country in Vietnam and all the great lessons he taught me about responsibility, about character and about life in general.

Instead my idiotic relationship with my imaginary friend took precendence, and I feel as if I never got a chance to truly say goodbye to my father. Instead, all my actions were colored through my religion. I remember a night I was praying over him while we were alone togehter in the room, telling him I was concerned that because he was a Catholic, he might not actually be saved; the terror in his eyes, unable to respond to me, still haunts me to this day.

I cannot forgive myself, and I cannot forgive those who continually spew this tripe in my face about a loving God in light of the terrible reality we see around us. It's disgusting, it's off-putting, and it's nonsense. I don't want nonsense. I want reality. Your God is disgusting and revolting and worthy of no respect, no love and no praise.

Thankfully, he doesn't exist.

Breckmin said...

Piero said:
"In fact, it is just one more piece of evidence in favour of the hypothesis that God does not exist."

There is NO evidence against God's existence. "In fact," all of the questions in the Loftus book can be explained with systematic theology....

Please list them one at a time so they can be explained with an answer that is not in the book.