Here is Richard Carrier's case against the resurrection. He comprehensively debunks the typical apologetics (based on the Pauline epistles) used by people like Gary Habermas and Mike Licona.
I've watched many debates on the resurrection over the past few days and the trend among apologists seems to be in ignoring the gospels and focusing on the letters of Paul, however if you would like some intellectual ammo against the gospels as well, Carrier provides it in this 8 minute segment from his debate with William Lane Craig:
Bart Ehrman also makes a great case against the historical reliability of the gospels in his debate with Mike Licona. Here is his opening statement: